Pages

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Seasonality in Indian Inflation (WPI) Data

Indian inflation as measured by Wholesale Price Index (WPI) is released every week. 2 weeks back this number came out negative for the first time in 30 years. Though, WPI is indicating deflation; no one in India is concerned about it and this negative number is attributed to high base index. In India the inflation is actually calculated year-over-year (y-o-y), unlike other economies where inflation calculated as annualized month-over-month (m-o-m) change. Thus, the base index plays an important role in inflation calculation in India.

The problem with having a base index 1 year old is that the conditions may have changed, which makes y-o-y calculations misleading. Consider that last year oil was approaching $140 around July but is no longer the case today. Therefore, most countries prefer annualized m-o-m change. However, to annualize m-o-m data it is important to adjust the data for seasonality. Retail industry provides a to understand seasonality. In retail most of the sales happen in the last quarter (Q4) of the year (due to holiday shopping). Sales in Q3 and Q1 of next year will be considerably less than Q4. Thus without adjusting for seasonality it would be difficult understand the trend.

Now that we understand seasonality, the next question to consider is: Is there seasonality in Indian inflation data inflation (WPI) and whether we have seasonally adjusted data? The second question is easier to answer: there is no official (or unofficial that I am aware of) measure of seasonally adjusted data in India.

Office of the Economic Adviser, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, provides and maintains the WPI data. I downloaded the monthly WPI data from this site to figure out whether there is seasonality in the data.



Visual inspection of the plot gives no clue about the seasonality of the data. The trend is increase in the WPI throughout year except for 2008 when it ran up from under 220 to over 240 from Jan '08 to Aug '08. The chart clearly shows the impact that base year of 2008 has on y-o-y calculation. Since Feb '09 the data shows the same trend of gradual increase but since the base is increasing at a higher rate the inflation rate is actually decreasing!

Having hit a dead end with the visual method, I tried to see if there was any software available that could do the seasonal adjustment. I found x-12 Arima, which is used and maintained by US Census Bureau and used for official seasonal adjustment for all kinds of data. Moreover, this is also used by NZ and UK governments with some modifications. I tried making modification as identified in the NZ paper but did not get any meaningful differences from the default method. So to get the seasonally adjusted data I used the defaults for the program.


Now that I had adjusted data, calculating annualized inflation based on m-o-m changes was easy. However, using m-o-m made the inflation very volatile. So I decided to smooth it by averaging over a quarter (3-months) e.g. to calculate the inflation for May '09, I calculated m-o-m inflation for Mar '09, Apr '09 and May '09, took the average and multiplied the result by 12.
i.e. Annualized Seasonally Adjusted - 3 month average = [Average (Inflation current month + Inflation previous month + Inflation 2nd previous month)]*12.

The plot of seasonally adjusted data and y-o-y change in unadjusted data is provided below.


The chart clearly shows that seasonally adjusted inflation bottomed in Dec '08 and has been steadily going up since then. Therefore, now its easy to understand why the RBI (India's Central Bank) is not worried about deflation. It would be interesting to see RBI's policy looking at this data and see if they , however I could not find data on RBI's policy rate history.

The annual number, barring a price shock, is likely to remain negative for atleast couple of months. It would be interesting to see how the m-o-m data shapes out in the coming month. I believe it is important to keep an eye on this number. If the m-o-m data does not stabilize and continues in the same trajectory and RBI continues easy monetary policy then next year RBI may well be battling with inflation again.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Morning Assembly at KV

Reminded me of my days at school. I was in KV from classes 9 to 12 (Assam, Ambala, Kota and Amritsar).


Tuesday, June 16, 2009

iPhone in India

This post highlighted why the price of iPhone will not come down. In comments to the post I argued that in US, though law enforcement is better, service providers rely on the fact that cell phones are locked. This model has not been explored in India i.e. locking the cell phone to the provider. Here’s a thought, cut the price down to 10,000 to 15,000 and have a 2 yr contract with 1,000 to 1,500 monthly fee (data and 500 free minutes included). As long as the customer service is not horrible I am sure people will go out of their way to jail-break the phone.

The author later pointed out that iPhone is locked in India and people have managed to crack it. This got me thinking, can a cheaper locked phone work in India? I think it can.

I believe that locking the phone is not enough, the locked phone should provide a compelling value so that users do not crack it. If all you provide with iPhone (or any other smart phone like Nokia N97) is basic voice services then users are not tied to network but would try to get phone and move to another network where they can get a better deal. However, if you provide voice plan with a competetive data plan then you start creating value. Add to that the fact that when you crack a phone you lose warranty and run the risk of ruining it. Moreover, if you crack a phone you are locked out of the apps (apple has 50K, Nokia has started the service too) and you do not get s/w updates. All this discourages jail-breaking your phone.

How many people will actually crack an iphone if Airtel/Vodafone starts selling it for say Rs 10K. I don't know whether any studies have been done on this or whether the phone companies even have the data. Let me assume the worst, now to the next important question, how can companies minimize their losses if they do introduce a scheme like that.

One way to minimize losses will be to look at the existing users and reward loyal users. Start with post-paid users instead of pre-paid. Though, I know of people who are on pre-paid but have been with the same provider for over 5 years, I think targetting postpaid is better as those subscribers have already shown that their willingness to commit. Additionally, target customers who are spending more than certain amount (say Rs 800). Now create plans that will add value to this segment (say Rs 1200 with unlimited data). I believe this strategy has chance to succeed. Even if it fails (i.e. people take the phone and crack it) the cell phone providers will have hard data on how many people actually crack their phones. That data can be useful in deciding how much discount to give on the phone i.e. if a lot of people are cracking the phone price it closer to the current price, but if not many are cracking their phones then lower the price.

With number portability in the near future and growth likely to slow in a couple of years, service providers need to look at ways to lock their existing customers. Providing discounted phones, with a competitive plan is a way to not only retain their subscribers but also to boost ARPU's.